Module 2: Design & Implementation

Event Streaming & Kafka Concepts

Understand event logs, consumer groups, ordering, and delivery semantics.

Learning objectives

By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:

  • Explain the key concepts and when they are useful.
  • Apply the concepts to a realistic engineering scenario.
  • Identify common failure modes and choose a practical mitigation.
  • Complete the assignment and explain your design decisions.

Core concepts

A stream is an ordered log within a partition, not a global ordering guarantee. Consumer groups distribute partitions across consumers. Offsets track progress, while keys influence partition placement and per-key ordering. At-least-once delivery can repeat messages; consumers therefore need idempotent processing.

Worked example

A robust event includes event_id, event_type, occurred_at, schema_version, and payload. Treat producer retries, consumer restarts, poison messages, schema evolution, and replay as normal operational cases.

Engineering principles

  1. Make assumptions explicit. Document expected inputs, outputs, ownership, and failure behavior.
  2. Validate at boundaries. Treat user input, files, messages, and third-party responses as untrusted.
  3. Design for failure. Decide what happens when dependencies time out, data is malformed, or a process is retried.
  4. Prefer observable behavior. Log meaningful outcomes and expose enough diagnostics to debug without leaking secrets.
  5. Test the invariant. A test should prove a property that must remain true, not merely repeat the implementation.

Practical assignment

Design an order-created event flow that updates analytics without making checkout wait for the analytics consumer.

Suggested solution and reasoning

Publish a versioned event, validate its schema, partition by order ID if per-order order matters, store processed event IDs or use idempotent upserts, and route repeated failures to a dead-letter process with monitoring.

Use this as a reference design, not the only possible answer. A strong submission states assumptions, includes failure cases, and demonstrates how correctness will be tested.

Knowledge check

  1. What problem does this design solve, and what simpler alternative did you consider?
  2. Which input or dependency is most likely to fail?
  3. What invariant must remain true after a retry?
  4. How would you test the unhappy path?

Completion checklist

  • I can explain the concepts without reading the lesson.
  • I completed the practical assignment.
  • I tested at least one failure scenario.
  • I documented trade-offs and next steps.

Continue learning

Was this page helpful?
Powered by IndieFounder